New method of precipitation forecast model and validation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v74i4.4359Abstract
There is a lot of time series data in many realistic sectors with different forecast techniques over the years. However there is no unanimous conclusion on forecast techniques such as individual forecasts Autoregressive, Moving averages, Autoregressive Moving average, Autoregressive Integrated Moving average, Artificial Neural Network, Long Short Term Memory network and Auto-Regressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity / Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity and combination of forecast (simple Average of forecasts, Minimum variance method, and Regression method of the combine). The most empirical hydrological time series models do not accurately forecast the weather. This paper focuses on a comparative study of different existing individual and combination forecasts with the proposed Hybrid Stochastic Model (HSM) forecast procedure. For this we consider a hydrological time series data of the Indian subcontinent to test the proposed forecast model. As a whole in comparison to all other traditional model's contributions accuracy, the proposed model performed well, and also we examined the model's dimension reduction approach to choose an optimum number of forecast techniques to be included in the model to yield the best forecasts.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 MAUSAM

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published by MAUSAM are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This permits anyone.
Anyone is free:
- To Share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- To Remix - to adapt the work.
Under the following conditions:
- Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even
commercially.