A comparative study of the climatological estimation Of potential evapotranspiration
A comparative study of potential evapotranspiration (PET) by various methods, viz., Penman (1963), Monteith (1964) and Thorn and Oliver (1977) in relation to mesh-covered class A Pan evaporation (EP) is presented for 9 radiation stations situated in different agroclimatic zones. Computation of PET by Monteith's method for a tall crop is recommended for adoption in place of Penman's method (1963).
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 MAUSAM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published by MAUSAM are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This permits anyone.
Anyone is free:
- To Share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- To Remix - to adapt the work.
Under the following conditions:
- Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even